//
you're reading...

Biology

When having babies, is quantity or quality better?

Paper: Sibly, R. M., Kodric-brown, A., Luna, S. M., & Brown, J. H. (2018). The shark-tuna dichotomy : why tuna lay tiny eggs but sharks produce large offspring. Royal Society Open Science, green(5), 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1098/ros.180453

 

Why do humans typically only have one baby at a time while other animals, like fish can release millions of eggs at once? This is a relatively cumbersome evolutionary question that requires scientists to uncover how and why certain traits have evolved. As a general rule, evolution favors traits that increase an individual’s chance of reproducing and passing its genes down to the next generation (i.e. increasing the individual’s fitness).

Side by side comparison of fish (left) and shark (right) eggs. Fish eggs are less than 1 cm while the shark egg case is nearly 12 cm long. Images modified from Pixnio and Wikipedia.

Among the more than 30,000 species of fishes, there is a huge spectrum of reproductive tactics employed. Some broadcast spawn, sending their unfertilized gametes unprotected into the environment, while others reproduce via internal fertilization. Some species lay eggs, and others will give birth to live young. Some parents leave their babies to forage for themselves right from the start, and other babies are cared for by brooding parents. Some individuals don’t mate at all – only producing clones of themselves – and some change sex halfway through life to try and boost their reproductive output. Even with this plethora of baby-making options, fish still fall into one of two overall reproductive trends:  produce lots of small eggs or produce a few larger offspring. The first strategy is seen in bony fishes (called teleosts), like tunas and Mola mola, which produce large numbers of incredibly tiny eggs that weigh only about 1 milligram each (about the weight of a small snowflake) and typically reproduce via broadcast spawning. Cartilaginous fishes (sharks, skates, rays, and chimaeras) fall into the second category, producing few, large offspring that are internally fertilized and either live-born or protected in sturdy egg cases. Some new-born sharks can weigh over 20 pounds!

Scientists wanted to know why there is such a strict dichotomy in fish reproductive strategies and why some intermediate, Goldilocks option hasn’t evolved as well. To answer this question, researchers put evolutionary hypotheses to the test, modeling just how and when these two disparate reproductive strategies would improve the fitness of species. They analyzed how reproduction would be influenced by the trade-off between offspring number and size.

The More the Merrier

An anemone fish takes care of its many, small babies. Image from wikimedia commons.

 

Since fitness is essentially a measure of reproductive success, it would seem intuitive that a fish capable of releasing a million eggs in a single day (strategy 1), each of which has the potential to become a baby fish with its parents’ genes, would have a higher fitness than an individual that can only produce one or two babies at once (strategy 2). But here’s the flaw with that logic: although each of those little eggs has the potential to become a baby and eventually an adult fish, it is just that – potential. Fish that produce a million eggs at a single time typically broadcast spawn, meaning they spew their eggs into the big blue ocean hoping that the eggs will encounter another fish’s sperm, get fertilized, develop into an extremely tiny larval fish, and eventually grow up and reproduce. But many of the eggs or babies will be swept up by the currents, eaten by other animals, and eventually die before ever making it to adulthood – maybe not such a phenomenal idea after all.

Quality Over Quantity

Alternatively, animals that have relatively few offspring may be able to invest more in their babies. A mother only has so much energy available to give her babies. Much like sharing a pizza with your friends, the more people you invite to the party, the less food there is to go around. The cartilaginous fishes with fewer babies may be able to invest more energy into each individual, spend more protecting developing babies (by producing tough, protective egg cases or carrying developing young in-utero), and ultimately get their few offspring off to a safer start to the rest of their lives.

A developing shark is protected by a thick egg case. Image from flikr.

So there is an evolutionary trade-off at hand – produce a ton of small babies and hope that a fraction will survive to pass down your genes (even if 10% of your million babies survive you have a hundred thousand kids carrying a copy of your DNA!), or spend a lot of time and energy to ensure that at least one or two of your babies have a better chance of survival.

In the End, Death is the Great Equalizer

Based on their models, the researchers found that the fitness of each reproductive strategy is dictated not just by how much energy a mother can invest in her offspring but is also heavily influenced by the likelihood that those offspring are going to die. Bony fish and sharks experience different juvenile mortality rates. The small bony fish offspring grow fast and have a lower initial death rate. Even though the majority of these smaller fish will eventually get eaten, enough will grow rapidly and become large enough to survive into adulthood to reproduce. Sharks, on the other hand, have a higher relative mortality rate compared to their growth rates, so it is advantageous for them to produce larger offspring that are better able to compete for resources and are, therefore, more likely to survive. It is possible that these reproductive strategies are further constrained by other factors like environmental conditions (i.e. smaller eggs are more able to deal with the salty ocean than larger eggs). But for whatever reason, it appears that for marine fish there is no middle-road: it is only advantageous to have a lot of little babies or spend more energy producing a few big ones.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Post a Comment

Instagram

  • by oceanbites 2 weeks ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Feeling a bit flattened by the week? So are these summer flounder larvae. Fun fact: flounder larvae start out with their eyes set like normal fish, but as they grow one of their eyes migrates to meet the other and
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com