you're reading...


Captain’s Log: Hunting for Data in an Era Gone By

 Article: Townhill BL, Maxwell D, Engelhard GH, Simpson SD, Pinnegar JK (2015) Historical Arctic Logbooks Provide Insights into Past Diets and Climatic Responses of Cod. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0135418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135418


In the days before global connectivity and rigorous standardized study procedures, marine science wasn’t always as well planned as we might like today. For instance, starting in the 1930s in the Barents Sea, northeast of the coast of Norway, many surveys were taken by various groups to investigate the regional cod population. Cod is the most economically important species in the region, supporting much of the European demand. This fishing ground is important for a few reasons. Firstly, it represents the northernmost extent of Atlantic cod, whose population sizes are strongly correlated with temperature. This cold northern boundary is where the effects of a warming climate will be most visible in cod populations, as populations tend to increase as climate temperatures increase. Other modern-day studies have shown that temperature is one of the most important environmental factors in cod population, as illustrated by this team of researchers via the correlation of fish biomass (all the mass of the combined caught fish for the year) and an index representing the change in overall climate of the Barents Sea based on air temperature, sea temperature, and ice cover (Fig.1).

Figure 1

Figure 1: Cod biomass (blue) and a Climate Index based on air and sea temperatures and ice cover. Covers the period from 1916 – 2013. Note that as temperatures warm (higher Climate index) cod biomass increases. After doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135418.g001

Secondly, the Barents Sea itself is representative of the Arctic Ocean, as it is the part of the boundary between the Atlantic and Arctic basins. It is more accessible to ships to study, while still behaving as most of the Arctic ocean does in response to climate changes. Both the region and the fish stock are considered sensitive to climate change based on modern data, but gathering longer term data on the ecosystem can help predict future changes more accurately. Today, cod populations are at a high not seen since the 1950s, when ocean temperatures were similar to present day. Intrigued by this relationship, this study examined logbook and survey data from ships in the 1930-1960s to see if any useful data could be drawn out of the somewhat informal and non-standard records.


From 1930 to 1960 (with a gap during World War II), British mariners conducted surveys to evaluate the state of the cod fishery in the Barents Sea. The survey records that survived to modern times have now been digitized to allow scientists to easily utilize the collected data. The surveys focused on trying to connect catch size with environmental variables. As mentioned above, temperature is one very important variable in cod growth and population size. Other variables recorded included salinity, bottom and surface temperature, and depth. The surveys sometimes also recorded stomach content of the cod, in order to determine what their dominant prey was.

The British survey ships behaved somewhat like normal commercial fishing vessels, following schools of cod and going to areas they predicted would result in larger catches. In terms of analyzing the distribution of cod in the Barents Sea, this was not a particularly robust plan, but the present day study can still make use of the information.

The present day researchers performed an initial filtering of the survey data by observing outliers and revisiting the survey log books to remove any obviously inaccurate records. Afterwards, the database of historical data included information on location, time, depth, temperature, salinity, and catch size for 17 years. Stomach content and prey type information was available for 12 years. All of this information was fed into a series of statistical models know as Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) to determine what factors had the biggest impacts on catch size and prey type. GAMs first fit the response variable (cod catch size) to a ‘family’ of statistical distributions. These ‘families’ are sets of mathematical probability distributions that describe the data well. The GAM model then fits the predictive variables (temperature, depth, etc.) to functions that relate the relationship between each predictor and the response. Each predictor function is then added up to result in the response variable family function. This is done many times with slight tweaks to various fit functions. The researchers examined all of the possible models to determine the ones predicted the cod catch best. This involved finding the models that best balanced the degrees of freedom and model deviance. Degrees of freedom is essentially a description of the wiggle room of the model, more freedom means it’s easier to get a good answer, but there’s a greater likelihood that answer may be wrong. The model deviance is simply the deviance of the model prediction and the real world data.


Figure 2

Figure 2: Cod CPUE (a measurement of catch size) at each survey station from 1930–1959. Crosses represent stations where no cod were caught. Size of the circles represent CPUE. Blue = winter, purple = spring, red = summer, orange = autumn. After doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135418.g002

As shown in Figure 2, catch size varied considerably both spatially and seasonally. Looking at all of the surveys combined, there were peaks in catch sizes around 1945-49, which then sharply declined in the early 1950s (Fig. 3). The study found that there were trends in catch size and the various environmental variables, with all of the variables except salinity showing as statistically important in the models. The highest catches were seen at bottom temperatures of 2–4°C and surface temperatures 0–6°C, from 15–45° E longitude, 73–77° N latitude, and from 150–250 m depth, with bottom salinities in the range 34.8–35.2 psu (Fig 4). These describe the areas where you’d likely to find the most cod. The models found bottom temperature to be the most important environmental predictor of catch size. Similarly, most of the variables except depth also had a statistically important relation to the prey type the cod were eating. Accounting for all of the variables explained 89% of the deviance in the data, indicating strong relationships.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Cod catch for all stations combined for the entire survey period. After doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135418.g003

Overall, using only data collected form these surveys, the researchers were able to support present day findings on the environmental predictors of cod population sizes. The statistical techniques and computational power used weren’t available during the time the surveys were conducted, so this produced brand new information. Many of the relationships confirm present day patterns, and this new database can be used to extend the time range of Barents Sea cod patterns from the 30s to present day. This gives ecosystem modelers a longer series of information to adjust their models with, hopefully improving their predictions of cod population change as the Earth’s climate continues to change. For instance, this study shows evidence of a northward shift in cod during the warmer years of the record, as well as continuing the trend of larger population sizes overall during warm periods.

Broader Impacts

Figure 4

Figure 4: Relationship between CPUE and spatial and environmental variables. After doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0135418.g004

This study showed that historical data sets, even if non-standardized and conducted under non-ideal conditions, are worth digitizing and distributing to scientists. New techniques can extract data from these old records and make new insights about the past state of the environment, which in turn gives insight to the future. This type of historical data extraction is being undertaken across many fields, and is providing an interesting look into the planet’s past.


Does your family have any old log books or heirlooms that might contain helpful scientific information? Are there any institutions near you that could help you determine how to provide that information to scientists who may be looking for it?


No comments yet.

Post a Comment


  • by oceanbites 3 weeks ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Feeling a bit flattened by the week? So are these summer flounder larvae. Fun fact: flounder larvae start out with their eyes set like normal fish, but as they grow one of their eyes migrates to meet the other and
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com