you're reading...

Alternative Energy

Going nuclear: radioisotopes from Fukushimi power plant stay in sand for years

Article: Unexpected source of Fukushima-derived radiocesium to the coastal ocean of Japan. 2017. Sanial, Buessler, Charette, and Nagao. PNAS. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1708659114

There are almost 450 nuclear power plants in the world. These plants use nuclear fission (splitting of atoms) to heat water, which produces steam. This steam moves giant turbines and produces energy. Nuclear power plants produce large amounts of energy without using fossil fuels, which produce greenhouses gases that contribute to global warming. After being built, they are also relatively cheap to maintain and run. However, they are also potentially dangerous when improperly managed, and major accidents can lead to nuclear meltdowns and contaminate large areas with radioactive materials. These materials can cause cancers, genetic mutations, and birth defects in living things, including humans.

Figure 1. Map of nuclear powerplants in the world, circa 2013. From reddit.com.


Figure 2. Pictures of Fukushima Daiichi before and after the tsunami and resulting nuclear meltdown.

About half of these nuclear power plants are in coastal areas, making nuclear safety a concern for marine policy makers and conservationists. In 2011, a huge earthquake (magnitude 9) rocked the coast of Northeastern Japan. This earthquake caused a tsunami up to 20 feet high to crash against the Japanese coast. The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant was hit by this tsunami, resulting in nuclear meltdowns and release of radioactive materials.

One of the radioactive materials that was released was cesium 137, or 137Cs. 137Cs is an isotope produced through fission, i.e. breaking, of radioactive Uranium, in places like nuclear reactors. After the Fukushima meltdown, rivers and air were monitored for 137Cs. The highest concentrations of this atom were released immediately after the accident, and low levels of cesium are still being released from the accident today. Most of the escaped cesium made it into the ocean, either from rivers, from transport in the atmosphere, or from groundwater running directly from the accident site. Or at least that is what we thought, as these avenues were the only ones measured for radioactive cesium after the event.

Figure 3. Super pure cesium stored under argon, from wikipedia.org

A group of scientists in Massachusetts and Japan found a new source of 137Cs to the environment after the Fukushima accident. From 2013 – 2016, these scientists visited 8 different beaches within 100 km of the accident site. They took sand and water samples, which they measured for radioactivity using equipment that detections gamma radiation. Gamma radiation is a type of radiation in which photons are produced, and this type of radiation can pass through human bodies, causing all sorts of genetic problems. Scientists here were measuring the gamma radiation because 137Cs emits this type of radiation, so you can detect 137Cs by its distinctive gamma radiation patterns.

The scientists were also curious about how 137Cs interacts with the sand on these beaches. Sand adsorbs particles, like radioactive cesium, and can hold onto it. Eventually these particles will desorb from the sand, and be released back into the environment, like into seawater. The scientists did experiments where they tested how much 137Cs would adsorb onto the sand particles and stick there by flowing water with extra 137Cs through sand, and measuring how much 137Cs filtered through. They also used clean seawater to test how much 137Cs would ‘unstick’ from the radioactive sand samples by percolating the water through the sand for 4 hours.

The scientists found that at the bottom of their sand samples, up to 2 m deep into the beach, the 137Cs concentrations were incredibly high. They measured up to 480,000 Bq per square meter (Bq is a measure of radioactivity) in their deepest samples. The soil in the restricted zone of the Fukushima site, up to 100 km away, measured ~100,000 Bq per square meter. This means even tens of kilometers away, the radiation can actually be higher than near the disaster. They also measured 137Cs in rivers and seawater, which were thousands of times lower concentrations, meaning that the 137Cs must be coming from the sand, and not the surrounding water.

Figure 4. (Left) Locations of beaches studied, and the location of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP), marked with the nuclear symbol. (Right) Amounts of radioactive cesium in sand from the Yotsukura Beach (the red dot on the map). The units are in Bq per kg, which is a measure of radioactivity. Note the deeper sands have much more radioactivity. From Sanial et al., 2017.


The sand adsorption and desorption experiments supported this hypothesis. These experiments showed that 99% 137Cs stuck to the sand during flowing through it. These experiments also showed that these radioactive atoms would come loose from the sand into water. Calculations and modeling performed by the researchers concluded that from 2013-2016, the amount of 137Cs released from sands into the ocean is similar to the amount of 137Cs released from underground the Fukushima disaster site itself during this time period.

How did this much 137Cs get into these sands? The scientists proposed that immediately after the Fukushima accident, ocean waves carried 137Cs along the Japanese coast. This radioactive mixed into beach sands, where the 137Cs adsorbed onto sand particles. In the years after the event, the 137Cs washes off the sand and into the ocean water, bringing more 137Cs into the ocean over a long time period (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Proposed model for how radioactive cesium was transported from the Fukushima nuclear power plant to beaches further away from the disaster site. From Sanial et al., 2017.

What should we take away from this study? The authors point out that this major reservoir of radioactive materials in the sandy beaches need to be considered in future nuclear management strategies. With proper planning for these disasters, the environment can be protected and harm to environments, including the ocean, can be mitigated.


No comments yet.

Post a Comment


  • by oceanbites 2 weeks ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Feeling a bit flattened by the week? So are these summer flounder larvae. Fun fact: flounder larvae start out with their eyes set like normal fish, but as they grow one of their eyes migrates to meet the other and
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com