//
you're reading...

Biogeochemistry

The Subtle Response of Plants to Rising CO2 Levels

Source: Keeling, R. F.; Graven, H. D.; Welp, L. R.; Resplandy, L.; Bi, J.; Piper, S. C.; Sun, Y.; Bollenbacher, A.; Meijer, H. A. J. Atmospheric evidence for a global secular increase in carbon isotopic discrimination of land photosynthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017, 114 (39), 10361-10366. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619240114

 

Tradeoffs in a changing world 

Plants need three main ingredients to photosynthesize: air, water and light. But acquiring these resources poses a tradeoff. Plants take in air – more specifically, carbon dioxide, or CO2—through holes in their leaves, called stomata (Figure 1). When plants open their stomata, they lose water through these holes via evaporation. But plants need to keep their stomata open at some point to acquire the necessary CO2, so they settle into a happy medium where they can get just enough CO2 to photosynthesize while also minimizing water loss.

 

Figure 1. Stomata (green) of the Tradescantia zebrina plant viewed under a microscope. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

 

What happens as the amount of CO2 in the air increases? All of a sudden, plants are able to take in more CO2 than before without losing additional water. Do plants choose one extreme, taking in only the CO2 they need and reducing water loss as much as possible? Or do they accept the water loss in exchange for an even greater amount of CO2, turbocharging their photosynthetic rate as much as possible? This tradeoff is similar in cars: having a fuel efficient car is great, but its efficiency likely limits it in power; on the other hand, you could opt for a less fuel efficient car that achieves much higher horsepower. So which do plants choose? To be more efficient or to up their photosynthetic horsepower?

In short, Keeling and his colleagues’ results showed that plants are opting for a balance somewhere between being efficient and powerful. But the researchers came to this conclusion by focusing on another more subtle change that’s been occurring simultaneously: plants are becoming more selective in the carbon they take in, choosing more of the lighter carbon atoms from the air than before.

 

Plants’ carbon preferences 

To understand the significance of this selectivity and how it relates to plant power and efficiency, it is first necessary to understand what a lighter carbon atom is and how it figures into photosynthesis. Atoms of the same element can have different weights depending on how many neutrons (neutrally-charged subatomic particles) each atom contains. Carbon exists primarily as two forms in nature: 13C (carbon atoms containing 13 neutrons), and the lighter, but less abundant 12C. Plants preferentially use CO2 molecules containing the lighter 12C isotope for several reasons. First, 12C diffuses more quickly through the stomata than the heavier 13C. Second, enzymes catalyzing the reactions that comprise photosynthesis also prefer the lighter isotope, which allows the reactions to proceed more quickly.

Why are plants becoming choosier? It turns out that isotopic discrimination and water use efficiency are related. There are two gatekeepers who choose between the isotopes: the stomata, and the enzymes involved in photosynthesis. When there’s more carbon in the atmosphere, more will be flowing through the stomata. This means that more carbon is reaching the enzymes, which get the chance to be even more selective for the lighter isotope. Some studies suggested that plants would choose to increase their water use efficiency, narrowing their stomata to allow the same amount of carbon in, meaning no change in isotopic choosiness. But this is not what Keeling and his colleagues saw; instead, they found that plants were taking up an even higher proportion of their preferred 12C than before.

 

Balancing the carbon isotope budget

Keeling and the researchers weren’t necessarily focusing on plants in the beginning. They were instead examining the ratio of 12C to 13C in the global atmosphere. When tracking the processes that influence atmospheric carbon isotopes, including fossil fuel burning and ocean-atmosphere CO2 exchange, the scientists found a gap between their modeled atmosphere and observations. No combination of uncertainties in any of their calculations could account for the discrepancy. Keeling and his colleagues recognized that there was some process they weren’t accounting for, and wondered whether the exchange of CO2 between the land and atmosphere (Figure 2) had something to do with it.

 

Figure 2. The Streblus asper, commonly known as the sandpaper tree. Leaves, and more specifically stomata, are the channel by which plants exchange gas and water with the air. Source: Forestowlet via Wikimedia Commons.

 

Using a combination of computational earth models, the researchers simulated scenarios in which plants were choosing to draw down the lighter carbon isotope more than they were before. They found that they could match the observed carbon isotope balance in the atmosphere if they increase the uptake of 12C by plants. Their finding is backed by tree core records, which show that plants indeed take in more 12C when the surrounding CO2 becomes more abundant.

 

Plants in the present, plants in the future

Keeling and his collaborators’ findings were twofold: they were able to balance the global carbon isotope budget by accounting for this increased isotopic selectivity by plants. They also showed that when faced with increasing abundance of available CO­2 in the air and the option of choosing between efficiency and increased growth, plants choose to settle somewhere in between to optimize both. While it is promising to see that plants are using the changes in our climate to their advantage, many questions remain about what these changes mean for plants’ ability to sequester carbon, as well as about how plants will adapt as we reach even higher thresholds of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Keeling and his collaborators’ findings are important additions to our understanding of how plants are adapting to climatic changes, and how our biosphere might operate in the future.

 

Discussion

No comments yet.

Post a Comment

Instagram

  • by oceanbites 9 hours ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 1 week ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 2 weeks ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 3 weeks ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    Feeling a bit flattened by the week? So are these summer flounder larvae. Fun fact: flounder larvae start out with their eyes set like normal fish, but as they grow one of their eyes migrates to meet the other and
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    Have you seen a remote working setup like this? This is a photo from one of our Oceanbites team members Anne Hartwell. “A view from inside the control can of an underwater robot we used to explore the deep parts
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Today is the day of  #shutdownacademia  and  #shutdownstem  and many of us at the Oceanbites team are taking the day to plan solid actions for how we can make our organization and the institutions we work at a better place
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com