//
you're reading...

Conservation

Is ‘Shark Week’ Good or Bad for Sharks?

Articles:

Myrick, JG and Evans, SD. 2014. Do PSAs take a bite out of shark week?:The effects of juxtaposing environmental messages with violent images of shark attacks. Science Communication, 36(5): 544-569.

O’Bryhim, JR and Parsons, ECM. 2015. Increased knowledge about sharks increases public concern about their conservation. Marine Policy, 56: 43-47.

Figure 1 - The Great White Shark, the star of Discovery Channel's Shark Week

Figure 1 – The Great White Shark, the star of Discovery Channel’s Shark Week

‘Shark Week’ – The Pinnacle of Summer Television

The Discovery Channel’s ‘Shark Week’ is one of the most highly anticipated summer television events each year. Since its inception in 1988, it has grown in popularity to become one of the most widely viewed summer television events around the world. Although Shark Week initially focused on shark conservation and education, the last decade saw a shift to entertainment-focused programming rather than focusing on education. Over the years, Shark Week programming has begun to show more and more footage of violent shark attacks (or dramatized recreations of violent shark attacks). Many scientists and conservationists believe that this media hype around shark attacks (which, in reality, are incredibly rare) fuels the general public’s fear of sharks. Furthermore, this unjustified fear of sharks may be a major barrier preventing their effective conservation, despite the fact that global shark populations are declining and 25% of all shark species are either threatened, endangered, or critically endangered.

Studying the Influence of Shark Week

There are only two scientific studies to date that I could find that directly addressed Shark Week’s impact on the public’s view of sharks. First, Myrick and Evans conducted an online survey of over 500 people that compared the responses of viewers to content from Shark Week vs. educational public service announcements (PSAs) created by environmentalist organizations. Participants watched a 3-minute clip from Shark week that either contained violent shark attacks or dramatized recreations of violent shark attacks, followed by either a PSA about shark conservation delivered by a celebrity spokesperson, a PSA with no celebrity present, or an unrelated “attention control” commercial. Other studies have shown that celebrity endorses can be effective in increasing support for issues like HIV/AIDs prevention, quitting smoking, etc. which inspired the investigation of the celebrity endorsers for shark conservation. The authors were trying to learn if PSAs “could take a bite out of” Shark Week’s violent portrayal of sharks.

The second study, by O’Bryhim and Parsons, conducted an in person survey of 186 individuals to assess their prior knowledge about sharks and whether or not this is correlated with their attitude towards shark conservation. The respondents were asked a series of questions about shark biology to determine their prior knowledge of sharks as well as where they obtained this information. Respondents were then asked how they feel about the importance and need for shark conservation.

What We Know About Shark Week’s Impact on the Public’s View on Sharks

Many factors contribute to the beliefs that a person holds on any one subject, including personal experiences, age, education level, culture, politics, where their information was derived from, and so on. Furthermore, many of these factors interact with one another, creating a very complex collection of variables that result in a person’s beliefs. This makes studying what factors may influence a person’s attitudes towards shark conservation inherently difficult. However, these two studies are a valuable first step in identifying what factors may contribute the most to our views about sharks.

For instance, in both studies, demographic data like age, gender, and education level had little to no relation to knowledge or opinions on sharks. The Myrick and Evans study found that watching videos of violent shark attacks cause a person to over-estimate their risk of being a victim of a shark attack, compared to those who do not watch videos of violent shark attacks. This finding agrees with many studies that have found that people who watch crime dramas on television over-estimate their risk of being a victim of a crime. They also found that dramatized recreations of shark attacks had the same effect as real footage and that celebrity endorsed PSAs and non-celebrity endorsed PSAs did not counteract this effect. This study demonstrates that a short clip promoting the value of shark conservation is not sufficient to overpower our strong fear response to watching shark attack footage. This information highlights the potential for dramatized Shark Week footage to skew the public’s view of sharks in a negative manner.

O’Bryhim and Parsons, on the other hand, found that increased knowledge about sharks is correlated with increased action towards shark conservation. Most interestingly, respondents who previously viewed shark week were more likely (31.2%) to believe that shark conservation was urgent than non-shark week viewers (19.6%). Additionally, people who scored well on their shark knowledge were more likely to have watched Shark Week in recent years. These findings demonstrate the potential for quality educational programming about sharks to increase awareness and action for shark conservation.

 

The Role of Shark Week on Viewers and the Role of Viewers on Shark Week

If you follow Shark Week at all, you have likely heard about the backlash over 2013 and 2014 programming. During this time, Shark Week stooped to unseen before lows by airing several “docufictions” or “mockumentaries” where paid actors pretended to be real scientists supporting complete falsehoods and myths. Shark Week 2013 debuted with the most widely criticized of these mockumentaries, “Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives.” This episode broke the record for the most viewed show in Shark Week history. And it was all a big, fat, misleading, lie. Contrary to the title, Megalodon is not alive. It has been extinct for over 2 million years. But besides simply tricking people into thinking there might be a huge shark out there in the ocean, this show also insinuated shark violence by basing the whole show off of a recreational boat that went missing off the coast of South Africa, suggesting that Megalodon ate the boat. They also showed footage that made it appear as though the researchers were attacked by Megalodon, but escaped before they were able to capture any videographic evidence of it. There are countless other examples of falsehoods and exaggerations that have been made, at times even at the expense of legitimate shark scientists.

The scientific and conservation communities made an uproar over this sort of programming, sharply criticizing Discovery Channel for the move. The good news is Discovery Channel seems to have listened. The new president of Discovery Channel has promised not to include docufictions in Shark Week programming and 2015 showed great improvements over 2013-2014. I plan to tune in, with hopes of seeing quality scientific research being highlighted on many species of sharks (not just Great Whites), and minimal distortion of facts. Let’s be clear, the Discovery Channel is in the business of entertainment. It is up to the viewers to demonstrate the entertainment in quality educational programming about fascinating sharks and the lack of desire for horror films masquerading as documentaries.

Discussion

7 Responses to “Is ‘Shark Week’ Good or Bad for Sharks?”

  1. Great topic! It is so sad when misinformation is portrayed as truth. This fear-mongering, sadly, does not do the sharks any favors. They are a necessary part of the oceans, whether people like them or not. We do not need to like them. They probably do not like us either. We just need to stop doing things that contribute to the demise of the species. They are not ours to do with as we please. Thank you for this post.

    Posted by Chris Marranzino | June 27, 2016, 2:36 pm
  2. Shark week continues to be an absolute disgrace for sharks. Despite all the greenwashing and the attempt to involve NGOs with their programming, they continue to promote fear-mongering and sensationalism. Hope they discontinue this week-long abuse on sharks disguised as anything else.

    Posted by José Truda Palazzo Jr. | June 27, 2016, 10:44 am
    • While some programming on Shark Week may have a negative impact, I believe that the shows that focus on quality scientific research could be an inspiration for future shark biologists or conservationists. In fact, thinking about it now, I can’t think of a single show on television where scientific research is the focus. I’d love to see Shark Week be the leader in that. Thanks for your comment.

      Posted by Derrick Alcott | June 27, 2016, 9:37 pm
      • Thank you for your reply! You are right in that good shows can inspire younger people to become researchers, but my concern is that on average the Discovery/Animal Planet shows are much more sensationalism than popula science or conservation issues.Yet I understand many people who do not know better think these shows may have a positive effect. Let´s hope Discovery finds the right balance one day, but so far they are unfortunately still leaning towards the “shark bite” part. Regards!

        Posted by José Truda Palazzo Jr. | June 27, 2016, 10:35 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] Source […]

  2. […] by Sandra Schleier, Original Post by Derrick […]

Post a Comment

Instagram

  • by oceanbites 3 weeks ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Feeling a bit flattened by the week? So are these summer flounder larvae. Fun fact: flounder larvae start out with their eyes set like normal fish, but as they grow one of their eyes migrates to meet the other and
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com