you're reading...


Little fish, big fish… which one poses the bigger threat?


Biton-Porsmoguer, S., Bǎnaru, D., Boudouresque, C. F., Dekeyser, I., Bouchoucha, M., Marco-Miralles, F., … & Harmelin-Vivien, M. (2018). Mercury in blue shark (Prionace glauca) and shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) from north-eastern Atlantic: Implication for fishery management. Marine Pollution Bulletin127, 131-138.

Have you ever heard the term mercury poisoning? It may not be as common as other types of poisoning but it is much closer to us than we think. Mercury is a naturally-occurring element whose emissions and deposits have increased exponentially with human activity (such as fossil fuel burning). Exposure to mercury can have toxic effects on our brain, kidney, and lungs.

Fig. 1 Sources of Mercury in the open ocean (Top). Mercury interaction in the ocean, from source to seafood (Bottom). Source: Coastal and Marine Mercury Ecosystem Research Collaborative.

 So, how are we exposed to it? In general, it is an element that naturally incorporates itself in many food webs that we take part in. Take ocean ecosystems for example: mercury is ingested by many fish and Invertebrates (prey) which are then eaten by larger fish (predators). Now, those predators (shark, swordfish, king mackerel, bluefish tuna, groupers, albacore tuna, and tilefish) continue to ingest prey throughout their lives while the Mercury in those preys accumulates in their muscle tissues. By the time we buy fish at the grocery store or fish market, we are eating a big, fat, tasty fish that may contain high Mercury content.

Fig. 2 Bioaccumulation is the increase of a pollutant in an organism (Top)  and Biomagnification is the increase of a pollutant in a food chain (Botton). Source: wethinklink

 So, how do we avoid this? The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has established regulations in the market to control for mercury content. No fish sold may contain more than 1 mg of Mercury per kg of fish. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the other hand, recommends not consuming more than 0.3 mg of Mercury per kg of fish and not to exceed total 0.0175kg of total fish per day.

 Does that mean that every fish is tested for Mercury levels? The answer is no! That’s a bit unnerving, so you may ask: Then how can they tell us that the fish you are about to consume is safe??  We depend on scientists to study the life history traits of important commercial species, which reveal an important measurement, the fish size to mercury level ratio. This ratio helps scientists recommend the maximum size a fish can reach without crossing into unsafe mercury levels.

 The Study

 Spanish and Portuguese commercial fishing fleets in the Northeast Atlantic capture a wide variety of shark species, using long-line fishing. Sharks captured are not size regulated and there is no knowledge of a mercury level content to size ratio across life history traits. Scientists sampled muscle tissues and stomach content of 48 shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) and 40 blue shark (Prionace glauca) from the Vigo Fish Market in Spain for Mercury concentrations.

Fig. 3 Blue Shark. Source: ARKive

Fig. 4 Shortfin Mako. Source: swfsc.noaa.gov


 Scientist found that Mercury levels in the shark’s muscle tissue increased with size and weight for both shortfin mako and blue shark. When sex, age, and season were taken into account, they found no difference in Mercury levels, meaning these variables cannot help predict mercury content in the sharks. However, the researchers noted that for blue sharks, mercury levels were higher if they were found North of the Azorean archipelago. The scientists also observed that shortfin mako mercury levels were within accepted standards, but the individuals captured were juveniles. Shark individuals larger than 190cm for shortfin mako and 250cm for blue shark in total length showed higher mercury content than considered safe by the European Union (1 mg kg1 wet weight).


Fig. 5 This graph shows Mercury levels on the y-axis and total body length on the x-axis. The trend we see is as body length increases, mercury levels in the sharks increases. Grey dots and line represent shortfin mako and black dots and line represent blue shark. Source: Biton-Porsmoguer et al, 2017

What does this mean?

 Using fish/shark size to mercury level ratio may continue to be a good management practice for this species. The scientists recommend captures of shark individuals to not exceed 200 to 250 cm for the blue shark and from 150 to 190 cm for the shortfin mako. However, this also presents a new challenge; capturing juveniles who have not reached sexual maturity or have not had the chance to reproduce will greatly decrease the population with time. Mercury content must be considered for public health safety as well as regulating shark captures to ensure sustainable fishing of the species. Lastly, this study continues to highlight the importance of research on life history traits for important commercial species and their implication on best management practices to conserve the species.

Hola mi nombre es Sandra Schleier. Soy graduada de la Universidad de Rhode Island con una Maestría enfocada en la restauración de corales en el Caribe. Actualmente soy la traductora del inglés al español de Ocean Bites con la meta de expandir nuestro alcance a los públicos que hablan español. Me encanta bucear, viajar y tomar fotos.

Hello my name is Sandra Schleier. I am a Master’s graduate from the University of Rhode Island. My research focused on coral restoration in the Caribbean. I am currently the english to spanish translator at Ocean Bites with the goal of expanding our reach to a spanish-speaking audience. I love to dive, travel, and take pictures!


No comments yet.

Talk to us!

Subscribe to oceanbites

@oceanbites on Twitter

Oceanbites Photostream