you're reading...


Tsunami Hunt: Studying Subduction Zone Faults for Preparedness

Paper: Bécel, A. et al. 2017. Tsunamigenic structures in a creeping section of the Alaska subduction zone. Nature Geoscience, v.10: 609-613.

A fishing boat crashes against a building after being swept ashore during a massive tsunami that hit the Japanese fishing port of Ofunato, Japan, March 15, 2011. Credit: Department of Defense.

Most of us remember the catastrophic 2011 earthquake and tsunami that struck Japan. The earthquake was a magnitude (M)9.0–9.1 undersea “megathrust” earthquake off the coast of Japan, with an epicenter approximately 70 kilometers east of the Oshika Peninsula of Tohoku. Megathrust earthquakes are massive quakes that occur at subduction zones, areas where one of Earth’s tectonic plates (moving parts of the crust) is forced beneath another and down into Earth’s mantle (Fig. 1). These interplate earthquakes are the planet’s most powerful. Since 1900, all earthquakes of M9.0 or greater have been megathrust earthquakes. The one in 2011 actually moved Honshu, the main island of Japan, 2.4 meters (m) east and shifted the Earth on its axis between 10 cm and 25 cm.

Even more destructive than the 2011 earthquake itself, however, was the massive tsunami wave that followed. Because megathrust earthquakes deform the ocean floor, they often generate a tsunami. The 2011 wave reached heights up to 40 m above sea level as it traveled 10 kilometers (km) inland. Tsunamis are particularly destructive when they’re generated by earthquakes that occur near the coast they devastate. In this case, they travel only a short distance, striking with massive force and limiting preparation time for residents.

Thankfully, tsunami warning systems are in place all over the world. But in order to improve our ability to predict and prepare for these waves, researchers continue to search for ways to better understand their origins, and why certain types of earthquakes may lead to particularly devastating tsunamis.

Fig. 1: Depiction of how tsunamis are generated near subduction zones. Credit: Wikicommons.

The earthquake that caused the 2011 tsunami is a starting point for this research. In that earthquake, over 50 m of tectonic plate slip occurred at the subduction zone. Movement, or “slip,” on the shallow-angled portion of subduction zone plate boundary faults (areas where the Earth’s crust is fractured, most commonly where two or more tectonic plates meet) can trigger very large tsunamis. This can occur when energy from large inter-plate earthquakes propagates to the trench (where one plate subducts beneath the other) or during “tsunamigenic” earthquakes, a special class of earthquakes that produce larger tsunamis than expected for their magnitude. These events primarily occur at subduction zones with thin layer of subducting sediment and highly faulted oceanic crust.

The Tohoku earthquake area additionally shows what may be another important feature that can be associated with tsunamigenic slip: a landward-dipping, normal-fault branching from the main megathrust-fault. Here is a video of how a normal-fault can generate a tsunami: “Tsunamis-Normal fault”. Shallow slip in tsunamigenic earthquakes is rare but very destructive, making it all the more important to extract data on structures associated with these events and apply it to our knowledge of the global subduction zone system.

Bécel and colleagues have identified another similar area: a segment of the Alaska–Aleutian margin called the Shumagin Gap (Fig. 2) that may have similar properties as the Tohoku region. Some researchers suggest that instead of rupturing in one large earthquake, most of the seismic energy in the Shumagin Gap is released through steady creep (releasing energy in small bursts). However, an earthquake in 1788 is thought to have ruptured and released energy laterally through the Shumagin Gap from the neighboring Semidi segment, and historical records suggest that the earthquake generated a large tsunami. Additionally, the area has historically produced large tsunamigenic earthquakes, including the M8.6 1957 earthquake that propagated laterally through a portion of the megathrust offshore Unalaska Island, causing an unusually large (23 m) tsunami, and the M8.6 earthquake in 1946 that ruptured the segment offshore Unimak Island (Fig. 2). These and other events highlight the importance of considering potentially tsunamigenic structural configurations in segments thought to be creeping or with no record of historical megathrust earthquakes.

Fig. 2: Map of the subduction zone off the Alaska Peninsula. MCS profiles are shown with red lines; ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs) are represented by white triangles. The yellow dashed line indicates the rupture extent of the 1788 earthquake. Moderate earthquakes (M6.9–7.5) that occurred in the last century are represented by black stars. Cyan stars show fault locations at the seafloor from new seismic and bathymetry data acquired from this study. The light grey line marks the trench. Convergence vectors are in white. Credit: Bécel et al. 2017.

The significance of unique segments like these was not appreciated until the 2011 event. The importance of recognizing the hazard posed by the Shumagin Gap was emphasized by a recent tsunami scenario for the Alaska subduction zone showing that a large tsunami in this segment could have devastating consequences to coastal communities locally in Alaska and around the Pacific Ocean.

Research on these subduction zone segments can be hard to conduct because their tectonic faults extend to great depths in the Earth. To study this section and others of the Aleutian Peninsula, the researchers used multichannel seismic (MCS) reflection, wide-angle reflection/refraction, and bathymetric data by towing a seismic airgun array behind a research vessel. Essentially, these methods work like sonar, emitting sounds at certain frequencies that can penetrate sediment and even bedrock to see what is happening beneath the sea floor. The researchers studied the mechanics of the fault system including the angle of plate dip, the coupling of plates (how strongly or weakly they interact or are locked with each other), the thickness of sediment, and investigated past activity of the faults.

The data showed signs that the Shumagin Gap could be prone to generating both transoceanic and local tsunamis, which would also explain past events generated by this presumed creeping segment. They saw a large, active normal-fault that may either slip coseismically, allowing displacement over a large area seaward of the fault, or be triggered by shallow earthquake rupture propagation, as determined for the Tohoku earthquake, and thus could either promote or result from shallow slip. In short, the results were favorable to tsunamigenesis.

Fig. 3: The 2011 tsunami not only struck Japan, but reached far across the Pacific, causing effects on a global scale. Credit: NOAA.

The results may also provide a recipe for tsunamigenesis accompanying earthquakes in the Shumagin Gap that researchers may look for elsewhere across the globe. Characteristics include thin subducting sediment, shallow angle dip, and a deeply-rooted active normal-fault within the overriding plate that may generate tsunamis because large slip on the shallow plate interface would force sudden movement (extension) in the overriding plate. If the normal-fault system is activated by a large earthquake, it could trigger shallow slip and uplift of the seafloor leading to the release of seismic energy over a large area.

There is still much that is not clear about the mechanics of the coupling of such normal-faults with megathrust-faults created by subduction zones. But this study demonstrates that normal- faults like one involved in the Tohoku tsunami are present in other subduction zones, and that such faults may be under-recognized globally. It also suggests that creeping regions might have greater tsunami potential than previously recognized. Identifying and characterizing the shallow megathrust configuration is therefore essential to our comprehensive understanding of tsunami hazards related to the global subduction system.


No comments yet.

Post a Comment


  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    Happy Earth Day! Take some time today to do something for the planet and appreciate the ocean, which covers 71% of the Earth’s surface.  #EarthDay   #OceanAppreciation   #Oceanbites   #CoastalVibes   #CoastalRI 
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 10 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 10 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 11 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 11 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com