//
you're reading...

Archaeology

Wrecked in New Zealand

 

Palmer, J., C. Turney, A. Hogg, N. Hilliam, M. Watson, E. van Sebille, W. Cowie, R. Jones, and F. Petchey, 2014, The discovery of New Zealand’s oldest shipwreck- possible evidence of further Dutch exploration of the South Pacific, Journal of Archaeological Science, doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.11.024

Link to Article

Introduction:

Ancient ports of vessel construction using Teak and the location of the wreck, closer up in B.

Ancient ports of vessel construction using Teak and the location of the wreck, closer up in B.

The historical time line of South Pacific Ocean exploration and mapping of Tasmania, east coast Australia, and New Zealand begins in 1520 when Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan discovered the passage from the Atlantic Ocean to the South Pacific Ocean via the Magellan straight.  More than a century later in 1642-43 Dutch explorer Abel Tasman visited the area, followed by British Captain James Cook in 1768-71.  However, there is speculation that there were additional explorative voyages by the Dutch between Tasman and Cook centered on Dieppe Maps which contained the north east Australian coast with Portuguese names.  It is even suggested that Captain James Cook used the maps during his 1768 voyage.  Further support is written in Cook’s notes when he documents Maori (native people of New Zealand) tales of ships that had been wrecked and the crew eaten, and the eventual acknowledgement by Cook that he had been preceded by another vessel.   Debris from a ship wreck found in Midge Bay near Kaipara Harbor on the west coast of Northland in Northern New Zealand (Latitude 36° 22’ 27” South, Longitude 174° 10’ 20” East; Figure 1) may be the first physical evidence of this voyage, making it the oldest shipwreck of New Zealand.

Methods:

The debris, including parts of the hull like a teak plank, rib sections, iron nails, and copper sheeting were recovered in 1982 before the remainder of the wreck was reburied by tidal and wave action.  The wrecks location was identified for this study using a high resolution magnetometer to narrow down an approximate position.  Then researches took a higher resolution survey of a 40 x 40 meter area using a walking gradiometer at .5 m grid spacing to identify a definitive location (Figure 2).  From the data collected the ship is identified as a dipole anomaly.  Scientists were looking for a signal that was an appropriate size for a ship wreck and that had the magnetic intensity concurrent with an object with minimal iron content.  Two limitations to their wreck-locating approach are the high background in the magnetics data because of iron-sand deposits and deep geologic structure across the area, and that the surveys could only be done during low tide.

Magnetometer survey data

Magnetometer survey data

Polished samples of the ships wood types, Teak and Lagerstroemia spp., were analyzed to try and reconstruct the original trees’ sizes.  Analysts used information on the number of rings and the ring thickness’, and accounted for sapwood and heartwood that wasn’t used for the construction to make their estimations.   The teak samples had variable ring thicknesses, an indicator the tree origin is from a moist climate. Comparison with modern trees from a similar environment, and estimates of growth rate and size based on tree rings, were used to estimate how old the tree was when cut down.

Radiocarbon dating by accelerator mass spectrometry was used to determine the 14C age of the wood.  The ages were calibrated using the Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon calibration dataset IntCal13 by wiggle matching (fitting several unknown data points in a constrained sequence to a calibration curve) to obtain an accurate and precise calendar age of the sample.  The varied ring thickness of the teak gave it a wide range of 14C age between1670-1944.  In contrast, the Lagerstroemia spp. has clearer rings, and a smaller 14C age range between 1663 and 1672 was determined.

The time the vessel was constructed was estimated by assuming time for the wood to have been seasoned and transported.  The high demand for building materials in that point in history and traditional curing methods of teak yield an estimated construction time to be 1705 A.D. give or take 9 years, placing it in the right time period to have visited the region after Tasman and before Cook.

Discussion:

To resolve the question of whether the investigated wreck was a local event or if it was transported to where it was found records of ship wrecks and data of regional ocean circulation were considered.  Wrecks are not uncommon in the 6 km wide opening of Kaipara Harbour which is subject to strong westerly winds and tides, and hosts several shifting sandbars near (.5 meters) the water’s surface but far (2-5 km) from the coast.  The entrance to the harbor has reports of 43 ship wrecks, the first from 1840, while the Kaipara coastline region has 113 shipwrecks, all of which were vessels sailing nearby, as oppose to the debris being transported by currents.   In addition, drift data available by the Global Drifter Program suggests the local currents are too weak and variable to have transported the wreck.

The ships origin is analyzed based on the wood type.  Teak is a tropical timber that is native to India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Northern Thailand, and Northwestern Laos. Properties like natural durability and stability make it a highly demanded supply for shipbuilding.  Lagerstroemia spp. is native to Southeast Asia and would have been available in Java (then Batavia) and India during the estimated time of construction.  An additional finding supporting a temperate origin is evidence of the bivalve Teredo navailis, a naval shipworm, which shortens the life span of wooden ships in the temperate and tropical waters.   The presence of shipworm could explain the copper sheeting on the hull recovered in 1982.  It is known that the Dutch often used copper to protect vessels from shipworm as early as 1670, compared to the English who didn’t start using it until the mid-late eighteenth century; clues like these help puzzle together where the ship came from.

Evidence from wood type, age reconstruction, materials, and ocean circulation have led investigators to conclude that the wreck is likely of Dutch origin, took place between the visits of Tasman and Cook, and is the oldest wreck known in New Zealand.  Further works including an extension excavation  of the wreck is needed to confirm the preliminary findings of this research.

The information obtained from this research and the like helps reconstruct a more complete picture of world history.  The techniques used in the investigation demonstrate the valuable information available with just a little digging and some math.

Happy Pi day!

Discussion

One Response to “Wrecked in New Zealand”

  1. The ship more than likely is the wreck of the Midge (which Midge Bay is named after) She was wrecked on 14 December 1871. Her construction was oak frame and teak planking. She was built by Langfords at Deptford England originally as a yacht, but proved too small for her owners. She was laid up sold again and was going to be used for passage to Venzuela but had to turn back to Gravesend. She was sold again to Captain Stuart and was sailed from Gravesend to Auckland arriving 22 April 1867. She was a screw steamer at the time and was later converted to a schooner. From her description on arrival her width 20ft (6.5m) as well as being covered in copper sheeting also matches the description given in the 2013 article

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/9519069/Mystery-300-year-old-shipwreck-could-rewrite-history

    Sources:

    ARRIVAL OF THE S.S. MIDGE AT AUCKLAND. (From the New Zealand Herald, April 22.)
    Hawke’s Bay Weekly Times, Volume I, Issue 16, 6 May 1867, Page 104

    TOTAL WRECK OF THE SCHOONER MIDGE.
    Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXVII, Issue 4466, 18 December 1871, Page 2

    Posted by Liz Clark (@madbushfarm) | August 17, 2015, 6:10 am

Leave a Comment on Liz Clark (@madbushfarm) Click here to cancel reply

Instagram

  • by oceanbites 2 days ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Feeling a bit flattened by the week? So are these summer flounder larvae. Fun fact: flounder larvae start out with their eyes set like normal fish, but as they grow one of their eyes migrates to meet the other and
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Have you seen a remote working setup like this? This is a photo from one of our Oceanbites team members Anne Hartwell. “A view from inside the control can of an underwater robot we used to explore the deep parts
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com