you're reading...


Chemical healing: how coral larvae and juvenile reef fish are using chemistry to choose a good neighborhood

Dixson, L. D.; Abrego, D.; Hay, M. E. Chemically mediated behavior of recruiting corals and fishes: A tipping point that may limit reef recovery. Science. 345, 892-897 (2014). doi: 10.1126/science.1255057

Images courtesy (clockwise from top left): www.ultraswank.com, public domain image, www.sail-world.com, www.nationalgeographic.com

Welcome to Detroit in 2014, once a booming center of the automotive industry, now famously bankrupt. A house can be had here for a mere $500, but, nobody’s moving in and nobody’s moving back.

A stroll in Detroit’s urban sprawl will find you in the midst of a city, in parts, reclaimed by nature—houses overgrown with weeds, abandoned factories, and skeletons of unfinished buildings. Throw in high crime and rampant unemployment, and, suddenly, it stinks to be in Detroit in 2014. You can keep your $500 America Dream, thank you, but no thank you very much.

In much the same way as the Detroit “stink” is maintaining the city’s steady acceleration into ghost town status, researchers have found that chemical cues from declining coral reefs are repelling new coral larvae and fish recruits from healthy neighboring reefs, leading to stabilization of seaweed-dominated reefs with compromised ecosystem function.

The findings reported in a recent paper in the journal Science by Dixson and co-workers are both ecologically fascinating, and potentially disruptive to coral reef management practices.

While previous studies have addressed the effects of stressors on adult coral reefs, Dixson et al. examine coral reef recovery in reefs from the perspective of recruitment of both coral larvae and juvenile reef fish species. Their combined laboratory and in situ approach examines behavior of coral larvae and juvenile fish in response to chemical cues from marine protected areas (MPAs) and contiguous seaweed-dominated reefs situated in non-MPAs from three sites in Fiji.

Dixson et al. first explored the idea of reef chemical attraction-avoidance by coral larvae through examination of responses to cues from divergent environments. They offered three species of laboratory-reared coral “planula” (coral larvae in their mobile pre-settlement phase) of the genus Acropora a choice between flumes from MPA and non-MPA waters. Larvae across species uniformly preferred flumes from “healthy” MPA reefs, suggesting discrimination between chemistries present in these divergent environments.


No place to start a reef. Acropora coral planula prefer water-borne cues from MPAs to those of non-MPAs (graph). MPA cues can make non-MPA water more attractive, just as non-MPA cues can make MPA waters repulsive (boxes). Image courtesy Science.

They next explored the specific sources of water-borne cues, hypothesizing that larvae might respond positively to cues from corals and crustose corraline algae (CCA) found in healthy reefs, and negatively to cues from seaweeds found in degraded reefs. Using the same two-flume setup, they took planula from a single species of Acropora (A. tenuis) and offered flumes of MPA or non-MPA waters flavored with invasive seaweeds, CCA, or corals. For coral-flavored MPA flumes versus untreated MPA water, they observed a greater preference for “conspecific” corals (same species, i.e., Species genus) as compared to “congeneric” corals (same genus, different species). Interestingly, they observed an even greater attraction to waters that combined flavors of multiple species of corals as compared to the conspecific flume, suggesting that a potpourri of healthy chemical cues from a biologically diverse ecosystem is more robust than an attractant from a single species. MPA water treated with CCA versus untreated MPA water showed an even more dramatic spike in attraction compared to the most attractive coral-treated water. Addition of CCA chemical cues to non-MPA water increased attraction, but considerably less than the increase observed in MPA waters. Addition of chemical cues from each of three species seaweeds associated with unhealthy reefs to MPA flumes lead to a dramatic reduction in attractiveness of MPA flumes.

In addition to water-borne cues, larvae are exposed to hydrophobic (water-hating) “allelochemical” cues found on surfaces of algae that harm corals upon contact. Due to their hydrophobicity, these cues would be absent from the flumes, which carry only water-soluble components. In order to address the question of whether hydrophobic cues affect coral settlement, Dixson et al. brushed tiles with CCA or one of three species of invasive seaweeds. They used untreated tiles and tiles painted with artificial seaweeds made of plastic as controls. Tiles were placed in aquaria containing larvae and settlement was monitored at intervals over the period of a day. CCA-painted tiles strongly promoted larval settlement as compared to the control tiles, while tiles painted with invasive seaweeds lead to only partial settlement with a significant fraction of larvae remaining in the water column or settling on control tiles at the end of the study period.


Can’t touch that. Larvae of Acropora tenuis avoid settlement of surfaces brushed with cues from invasive seaweeds, but show strong attraction to cues associated crustose corraline algae found in healthy reefs. Image courtesy Science.

To conclude their experiments on coral planula, Dixson et al. explored the relevance of their observation in situ (in the coral reef environment itself). They set up benthic (seafloor) plots in MPA and non-MPA reefs. In half of the plots from each location they cleared upright seaweeds at intervals, and monitored coral recruitment to the natural substrate for the period of “November-February recruitment pulse” when coral larvae are disbursed and scouting for real estate. Additionally, they erected platforms above the non-MPA and MPA sites adjoining both plots containing seaweed and plots for which seaweed was removed in order to distinguish between benthic (surface) and pelagic (water-borne) cues. No effect was observed for MPA and non-MPA sites for seaweed-free versus undisturbed quadrants, suggesting longer distance chemical cues were the dominant factors at play. Consistent with laboratory experiments, coral settlement was observed on the benthos of MPAs, but not that of non-MPAs. Interestingly, no coral settled on platforms in MPA sites, while appreciable settlement was observed on elevated platforms in non-MPAs, indicating the larvae were present in non-MPA sites, but actively avoided settlement of non-MPA benthos likely due to the same chemical cues observed in laboratory experiments.

Based on previous studies showing responses of reef fish to various cues (predator odors, home reef odors, etc.), Dixson et al. speculated that reef fish might distinguish between chemical cues from reef-dominated versus seaweed-dominated environments. Employing the same flume experimental setup, they surveyed the behavior of fifteen species of reef fish across six trophic classes (classified on the basis feeding habits) to chemical cues from MPA versus non-MPA reefs. The same species of juvenile “new recruits” were taken from MPA and non-MPA sites.  Juvenile fish from all classes were uniformly attracted to MPA waters and repelled by non-MPA waters regardless of trophic group and independent of “post-settlement experience” (where they came from).

Dixson et al. hypothesized that the most sensitive reef genus Acropora, which are the first to disappear from a reef in crises, would be chemically most attractive to reef fish. Fish were offered a choice between water treated with Acropora or one of two more resilient coral genera (Porites and Pocillipora), which alone increase the attractiveness of non-MPA streams. Consistent with their hypothesis, all species strongly preferred water flavored with Acropora to water flavored with other corals. Differential attraction was also observed for flumes flavored with different seaweed genera, with fish strongly avoiding seaweed commonly present in degraded reefs in favor of less invasive species of seaweed. Hence, fish favored cues unique to healthy reefs, while avoiding cues associated with degraded reefs.

Getting a cue. Reef fish display nuanced decision-making, preferring cues from sensitive “indicator” coral to more resilient coral species. Similarly, fish avoid seaweeds that are indicative of a full-reef take over, as opposed to seaweeds that occur in both healthy and unhealthy reefs. Image courtesy Science.

To corroborate their laboratory obervations, Dixson et al. turned to in situ surveys of recruit densities at each of the study sites. As anticipated from laboratory results, species diversity and density were higher in MPA versus non-MPA reefs. Notably, predator densities were higher in MPA reefs as compared to non-MPA reefs. Hence, the possibility of predator avoidance as a determinant of reef fish community structure could be excluded. However, the possibility of greater predatory efficiency in non-MPAs remained a viable mechanism in competition with chemical cues for explaining differences in population density between sites. Hence, Dixson et al. set up in situ experiments to assess survival rates of fish in artificial “rubble” habitats in MPA versus non-MPA waters. They used enclosed habitats to adjust for incidental mortality of fish in both settings. Survival in enclosures for the experimental period 100 percent, while survival for marked fish placed in artificial habitats was 20 percent in both MPAs and non-MPAs. Hence, differences in recruitment could be attributed to chemical cues rather than differences in predation efficiency between environments.

Promise Land. MPA sites exhibited higher number of recruits, higher species diversity, and more predators as compared to non-MPA for three coral reef sets surveyed in the study (named after the associated human villages). Image courtesy Science.

The findings of Dixson et al. suggest coral larvae and juvenile reef fish discriminate between healthy and unhealthy reef environments on the basis of chemical cues. Hence, the current practice of setting up MPAs as a source of recruits to neighboring non-MPAs might not be sufficient to restore coral reefs. Rather, conservationists may also need to adopt the approach taken by Dixson et al. of identifying specific cues in order to harness complex chemical feedbacks to encourage re-settlement of degraded reefs. Coral reefs are both ecologically and economically important, hence understanding the factors that lead to their demise and recovery is of key importance both from a conservation perspective as well from the perspective of people who rely on fish for nutrition, and fishing as a livelihood. While many unknowns remain, Dixson et al.’s study is a first in developing a nuanced understanding of the chemical feedbacks that govern reef resilience, granting coral reefs some hope of escaping Motor City Syndrome.



No comments yet.

Post a Comment


  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Happy Earth Day! Take some time today to do something for the planet and appreciate the ocean, which covers 71% of the Earth’s surface.  #EarthDay   #OceanAppreciation   #Oceanbites   #CoastalVibes   #CoastalRI 
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 10 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 11 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 11 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 11 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 12 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 1 year ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com