//
you're reading...

Fisheries

Impostor! How mislabeled seafood affects the amount of mercury you ingest

Marko PB, Nance HA, van den Hurk P (2014) Seafood Substitutions Obscure Patterns of Mercury Contamination in Patagonian Toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) or “Chilean Sea Bass”. PLoS ONE 9(8): e104140. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104140

What is mercury? Why is it in fish?

Mercury pollution is a byproduct of human activities including fossil fuel combustion and processing metal ores.  Methylmercury, the most common form of mercury, is a powerful neurotoxin.  (For more information on mercury, check out this OceanBites article!)  The toxin is incorporated in lower trophic level organisms (e.g., algae, plankton) and travels up food chains, all the way to top predators, in a process known as bioaccumulation.  Although mercury is present at low concentrations in the environment, the neurotoxin accumulates in higher concentrations as it travels up the food chain.  Concentrations found in different fish species vary widely (Figure 1).  These differences are generally attributed to body size and trophic level.  For example, fish that have longer lives and reach larger body sizes eat more and thus, accumulate more toxins in their tissue.

Figure 1. Mercury levels in commercial seafood, compiled by the US FDA 1990-2010 (Marko et al. 2014).  Dark bars are means, grey bars are medians, and error bars show the range of measurements (considerable variation within each species).

Figure 1. Mercury levels in commercial seafood, compiled by the US FDA 1990-2010 (Marko et al. 2014). Dark bars are means, grey bars are medians, and error bars show the range of measurements (considerable variation within each species).

Size and lifespan differences also contribute to a considerable amount of variability in mercury concentrations within each species (note the large error bars in Figure 1).  Variability also comes from within species with different geographical locations.  Two recent studies (Dawson et al. 2007; Hanchet et al. 2011) show that subpopulations of Chilean sea bass (a.k.a. Patagonian toothfish), a southern hemisphere fish species, have vastly different concentrations of mercury: ranging between ~0.15ppm and greater than 1ppm.  For reference, concentrations greater than 0.50ppm are banned from importing to New Zealand, Canada and Australia; the legal limit for the US and European Union is 1ppm.

Chilean sea bass stocks located at higher latitudes in the southern hemisphere (that is, close to the pole) have lower concentrations of mercury relative to body size than stocks located closer to the equator.  In fact, these high latitude stocks, such as the South Georgia/Shag Rocks (SGSR) stock, have mercury levels far below the legal import limits (~0.23ppm) while fish from the stocks near Patagonia have levels nearly three times greater (~0.73ppm).  Additionally, the SGSR stock is considered a sustainable seafood choice by Seafood Watch and officially certified by the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) as a well-managed stock with low by-catch (or, species caught that are not targeted by the fishery).  This combination of sustainability and low mercury content makes Chilean sea bass from the SGSR stock quite appealing to wise consumers.

However, seafood mislabeling is a widespread problem.  We often think of mislabeled seafood as a hindrance to making sustainable seafood choices, but it can also put the consumer unknowingly at risk of ingesting greater levels of mercury.

Methods

The authors set out to collect samples of fish labeled “Chilean sea bass” or “Patagonian toothfish” obtained from U.S. merchants.  They used “fresh” fish fillets (in other words, thawed) from retailers in 10 U.S. states.  Samples were immediately preserved for analyses.

Researchers collected genetic data from the samples to determine what proportion of the fish were in fact Chilean sea bass (CSB) and not some other species.  They found that 20% of fish were mislabeled.  Of the fish that were certified by the MSC, only 5% were mislabeled; 40% of uncertified fish were mislabeled.  Mercury levels were also measured in 25 of the MSC certified fish and 13 of the non-certified.  By comparing mercury levels, we can infer what stock (SGSR or low latitude stocks) the CSB actually came from.

Figure 2. Comparing mercury levels.

Figure 2. Comparing mercury levels.

Table 1. Total mercury concentration of fish sold as CSB with and without MSC certification indicating origin from the certified South Georgia (SG) fishery based on genetic analyses.

Table 1. Total mercury concentration of fish sold as CSB with and without MSC certification indicating origin from the certified South Georgia (SG) fishery based on genetic analyses.

Results

Mercury levels in the fish samples ranged from 0.07ppm up to 1.9ppm.  Fish labeled as MSC certified had less than half of the mercury concentration of uncertified fish (Table 1, Figure 2).  However, when fish other than CSB were removed from the analyses, the difference between certified and non-certified samples was only marginally significant.  Comparing mercury content of the MSC certified samples across haplotypes – or, genetically distinct fish— revealed that haplotypes that were known to be from the South Georgia (SG) stock were significantly lower in mercury than the not known haplotypes (Figure 3).

Figure 3.Comparing mercury levels of MSC certified fish across haplotypes.

Figure 3.Comparing mercury levels of MSC certified fish across haplotypes.

Significance

Although seafood mislabeling has been a known problem for some time, this study is unique in that it shows the prevalence of not only species substitutions, but also stock substitutions.  The combination of both frauds makes it difficult for consumers to know what the mercury content of their fish truly is. The study also makes clear that the differences in mercury content are minimized when only MSC certified fish are considered.  Although species substitutions occur in both certified and non-certified, the certified fish substitutions tended to have lower mercury content than the non-certified substitutions.  The combined effect obscured the true mercury concentrations of certified and non-certified CSB.

Within the true CSB from MSC certified catch, the mercury content differences (and DNA haplotypes) showed that the fish origins were mislabeled (Figure 3).  Although a Chilean sea bass may be certified, the stock it came from might not be from the certified South Georgia stock.  This fishery-stock substitution is much more difficult to detect than species substitutions and puts the consumer unknowingly at risk of consuming higher levels of mercury.  Furthermore, the mercury concentration differences for species substitutions was just ~7%, while stock substitutions could account for a 100% increase in mean mercury concentration!  The authors suggest geographic origins of fish should become a stronger focus in seafood consumption.  Finally, although there were substitutions apparent in both certified and non-certified, MSC-certified fish still had lower mercury concentrations, identifying these fish as safer for consumers.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] market demand. When mislabeling occurs, it not only cheats consumers economically, but it can also affect the amount of mercury unwillingly consumed and create mistrust for consumers who may decrease their seafood consumption.  On the supply side, […]

  2. […] Impostor! How mislabeled seafood affects the amount of mercury you ingest by Lis Henderson […]

Post a Comment

Instagram

  • by oceanbites 2 months ago
    Happy Earth Day! Take some time today to do something for the planet and appreciate the ocean, which covers 71% of the Earth’s surface.  #EarthDay   #OceanAppreciation   #Oceanbites   #CoastalVibes   #CoastalRI 
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 10 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 11 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 11 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com