you're reading...

Climate Change

Do we know what it means to engineer the climate?

Article: Fasullo, J.; Tilmes, S.; Richter, J.; Kravitz, B.; MacMartin, D.; Mills, M.; Simpson, I. (2018). Persistent polar ocean warming in a strategically geoengineered climate. In: Nature Geoscience. DOI: 10.1038/s41561-018-0249-7.

At this point, it’s undeniable that the climate is changing rapidly. There is indisputable proof that global temperatures have increased at least 1°C above preindustrial levels, and the subsequent effects are expected to intensify as temperatures continue to rise.

One consequence of this warming is sea level rise via glacial melt and expansion of water as it warms. Higher temperatures in the Arctic are reducing the amount of ice, thereby reducing how much sunlight reflects back to space (also known as albedo), leading to even warmer conditions near the poles. This is significant because temperature differences between the poles and equator drive the redistribution of heat through the atmosphere and ocean, which helps maintain the various climates familiar to life on Earth.

Most cities do not have the infrastructure to effectively handle heavier and more persistent rain enabled by a warmer atmosphere, nor have they been designed to prevent massive fires from spreading uncontrollably during abnormally dry conditions. More intense hurricanes are becoming a frequent occurrence, wiping out entire coastal communities. Cold spells and heat waves are not only an inconvenience to human life, but can devastate wildlife habitats. For example, increased ocean temperatures can alter communities of oxygen-producing, carbon-removing phytoplankton, stressing marine ecosystems by depriving them of oxygen and food.

The far-reaching effects of climate change have implications for the livelihood of all of Earth’s inhabitants; however, most of them (including people) have no direct control over most of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions driving it. The diversity of life on Earth, our food resources, the comforts of a habitable environment – these are just some examples of what’s at stake under climate change largely driven by those with the most power and money in society.

Geoengineering our way to safety… maybe

Climate concerns have led policymakers and scientists to ponder our options for taking action. While the latest report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated that we must reduce our global emissions to 55% by 2030 and to ‘net-zero’ by 2050 to limit warming to 1.5°C, researchers are also considering the potential of geoengineering – the attempt to manually change the climate system to reduce the impacts of climate change. Geoengineering methods are being considered in addition to mitigation (reduction of emissions) and adaptation (reduction of vulnerability to climate risks). One popular option is carbon management – that is, removing excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Another possibility is solar radiation management (SRM) – the injection of aerosols (clouds of tiny particles) into our stratosphere (upper atmosphere) that reflect the sun’s rays back into space, increasing its albedo. The idea is to counteract the increased heat retained by greenhouse gases like CO2 by deflecting more sunlight.

Geoengineering strategies like SRM have been confined to scientific study due to their potential risks, but the dangers of climate change are becoming urgent. If we can quickly reduce climate change with SRM, why haven’t we already done it? The main problem with this idea is that the climate is an unpredictable system. We don’t know how it will respond to being manipulated, and it could just make things a lot worse. We don’t know nearly enough to reliably implement SRM right now, but scientists are trying to change that.

Manipulating the climate in computer models

This study, led by Dr. John Fasullo at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), addresses the potential impacts of SRM on our climate system by using a state-of-the-art climate model to simulate the motion in the ocean and atmosphere (known as the Community Earth System Model). They compare business-as-usual emissions conditions (CO2 emissions stay as high as they are now) to the same conditions if aerosols were injected into the stratosphere at 15° and 30° latitude in both hemispheres. The hope is that by strategically injecting aerosols at specific latitudes from the year 2020 until the end of the century, the dimmed sunlight will regulate not only the global average temperature, but the north-south temperature differences that drive wind, ocean currents, and precipitation. All of these processes can push back onto the manipulated climate, changing it in unexpected ways.

Solar dimming revs up ocean circulation

Fig. 1: Air-sea fluxes of heat (a) and freshwater (b). In (a), red indicates heat flux from ocean to atmosphere; blue is opposite. In (b), brown indicates freshwater flux from ocean to atmosphere; green is opposite. Arrows indicate near-surface winds (Reprinted with permission from Nature Springer: Fasullo et al. 2018).

The simulation results show that, as expected, the SRM successfully reduced the global average surface temperature, in turn reducing global precipitation by lowering the heat needed for evaporation.

But there’s a catch.  One of the most prominent results of this study shows abnormally high heat content and heat transfer from the ocean to the atmosphere in the north Atlantic (above 45°N), an important region for global ocean circulation (Fig. 1).

More specifically, SRM changed the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) – a system of ocean currents in the Atlantic that redistributes ocean heat on long time scales, significantly impacting our climate. The high heat content in the north Atlantic indicates that SRM would speed up the AMOC (increasing ocean heat transport towards the poles) – the reverse of what global warming is expected to do.

Changes in precipitation and evaporation are the primary drivers of this phenomenon. Under this simulation, the subtropics (between about 23.5°N and 50°N) experience less evaporation due to reduced heating from the sun, while the north Atlantic experiences less rainfall, making it saltier. Wind increases, revving up the ocean’s surface currents and allowing more warm water to enter the north Atlantic from the south. Warmer water in this region causes more evaporation, taking fresh water and heat out of the surface and leaving behind denser, saltier water which quickly sinks to the bottom of the ocean (Fig. 2). The whole  process is like AMOC on steroids – SRM causes much faster heat transport to the poles than what occurs today. This forces more heat into the north Atlantic, and then into the deep ocean.

Fig. 2: A north-south transect of temperature (c) and salinity (d). Both show a collection of warm, salty water that sinks to the deep ocean in the north Atlantic (Reprinted with permission from Nature Springer: Fasullo et al. 2018).

So… is SRM good?

These results have broad implications for the potential of SRM and climate models. For starters, increased heat in the north Atlantic could enhance glacial and sea ice melt, counteracting some of the effects of SRM. Enhanced ocean heat content also has the tendency to expand ocean water and increase sea level. Both ice melt and water expansion are not promising in terms of SRM reducing sea level rise. Also, changes to AMOC and its relationship to other forms of climate variability in the region are still poorly understood.

In short, we don’t have a good idea of what revving up the AMOC will really do to our climate, given that climate models have yet to resolve all the significant components of the system. The truth is, a lot more work needs to be done to assess the viability of SRM and geoengineering strategies in general before we can even consider their implementation. Toying with the climate may have unintentional consequences, some of which could be catastrophic and irreversible. It’s important that the public is informed, not only about the potential of geoengineering, but its considerable risks as well.

Although most of us don’t belong to those powerful elite who drove us into our burgeoning climate catastrophe, we have the right to decide how we want to get out of it.

To learn more about SRM and its political implications, I recommend this recent article.


No comments yet.

Post a Comment


  • by oceanbites 3 weeks ago
    Not all outdoor science is fieldwork. Some of the best days in the lab can be setting up experiments, especially when you get to do it outdoors. It’s an exciting mix of problem solving, precision, preparation, and teamwork. Here is
  • by oceanbites 1 month ago
    Being on a research cruise is a unique experience with the open water, 12-hour working shifts, and close quarters, but there are some familiar practices too. Here Diana is filtering seawater to gather chlorophyll for analysis, the same process on
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #oceanbites  we are featuring Hannah Collins  @hannahh_irene  Hannah works with marine suspension feeding bivalves and microplastics, investigating whether ingesting microplastics causes changes to the gut microbial community or gut tissues. She hopes to keep working
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    Leveling up - did you know that crabs have a larval phase? These are both porcelain crabs, but the one on the right is the earlier stage. It’s massive spine makes it both difficult to eat and quite conspicuous in
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Cierra Braga. Cierra works ultraviolet c (UVC) to discover how this light can be used to combat biofouling, or the growth of living things, on the hulls of ships. Here, you
  • by oceanbites 3 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Elena Gadoutsis  @haysailor  These photos feature her “favorite marine research so far: From surveying tropical coral reefs, photographing dolphins and whales, and growing my own algae to expose it to different
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on Oceanbites we are featuring Eliza Oldach. According to Ellie, “I study coastal communities, and try to understand the policies and decisions and interactions and adaptations that communities use to navigate an ever-changing world. Most of
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Jiwoon Park with a little photographic help from Ryan Tabata at the University of Hawaii. When asked about her research, Jiwoon wrote “Just like we need vitamins and minerals to stay
  • by oceanbites 4 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  on  #Oceanbites  we are featuring  @riley_henning  According to Riley, ”I am interested in studying small things that make a big impact in the ocean. Right now for my master's research at the University of San Diego,
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Gabby Stedman. Gabby is interested in interested in understanding how many species of small-bodied animals there are in the deep-sea and where they live so we can better protect them from
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    This week for  #WriterWednesday  at  #Oceanbites  we are featuring Shawn Wang! Shawn is “an oceanographer that studies ocean conditions of the past. I use everything from microfossils to complex computer models to understand how climate has changed in the past
  • by oceanbites 5 months ago
    Today we are highlighting some of our awesome new authors for  #WriterWednesday  Today we have Daniel Speer! He says, “I am driven to investigate the interface of biology, chemistry, and physics, asking questions about how organisms or biological systems respond
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Here at Oceanbites we love long-term datasets. So much happens in the ocean that sometimes it can be hard to tell if a trend is a part of a natural cycle or actually an anomaly, but as we gather more
  • by oceanbites 6 months ago
    Have you ever seen a lobster molt? Because lobsters have exoskeletons, every time they grow they have to climb out of their old shell, leaving them soft and vulnerable for a few days until their new shell hardens. Young, small
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    A lot of zooplankton are translucent, making it much easier to hide from predators. This juvenile mantis shrimp was almost impossible to spot floating in the water, but under a dissecting scope it’s features really come into view. See the
  • by oceanbites 7 months ago
    This is a clump of Dead Man’s Fingers, scientific name Codium fragile. It’s native to the Pacific Ocean and is invasive where I found it on the east coast of the US. It’s a bit velvety, and the coolest thing
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    You’ve probably heard of jellyfish, but have you heard of salps? These gelatinous sea creatures band together to form long chains, but they can also fall apart and will wash up onshore like tiny gemstones that squish. Have you seen
  • by oceanbites 8 months ago
    Check out what’s happening on a cool summer research cruise! On the  #neslter  summer transect cruise, we deployed a tow sled called the In Situ Icthyoplankton Imaging System. This can take pictures of gelatinous zooplankton (like jellyfish) that would be
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Did you know horseshoe crabs have more than just two eyes? In these juveniles you can see another set in the middle of the shell. Check out our website to learn about some awesome horseshoe crab research.  #oceanbites   #plankton   #horseshoecrabs 
  • by oceanbites 9 months ago
    Feeling a bit flattened by the week? So are these summer flounder larvae. Fun fact: flounder larvae start out with their eyes set like normal fish, but as they grow one of their eyes migrates to meet the other and
WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com