//
you're reading...

Policy

Holistic management: the vital role of Indigenous Peoples in conservation on the high seas

Vierros MK, Harrison AL, Sloat MR, Crespo GO, Moore JW, Dunn DC, et al. Considering Indigenous Peoples and local communities in governance of the global ocean commons. Mar Policy. 2020;119: 104039. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104039

Celebrating Indigenous Peoples’ Day

On the second Monday in October each year, a growing number of states and cities in the US and around the world are celebrating Indigenous Peoples’ Day, a holiday established to take the place of Columbus Day. Instead of celebrating the violence of colonizers like Christopher Columbus, Indigenous Peoples’ Day acknowledges the true history of American colonization and its destruction of local peoples and places. Indigenous Peoples’ Day is a celebration of the strength and resilience of indigenous communities, as well as a reminder of the continued challenges faced by such communities in the face of colonial systems which continue today.

Such systems exist across spheres, from economic to social and political systems, including biodiversity conservation and policy. In particular, the ocean plays an important role in the cultures and subsistence of many island and coastal indigenous peoples and local communities. Many of these communities have been using and celebrating their local marine resources for thousands of years and, as such, have developed highly effective holistic management systems based on stewardship and intergenerational responsibility.

The global ocean commons

Marine species play important roles in indigenous and local communities as key resources and significant cultural symbols. This figure from Vierros et al. 2020 shows (clockwise from top left) an ancient turtle cave painting in Baja California Sur, Mexico, a salmon fisher from the Wet’suwet’en Nation in British Columbia, fur seals on St. Paul’s Island in Alaska, and Laysan albatross in Hawaii. Photo sources: Amanda Mirran, Dave Herasimtschuk, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, and Henry Wood Elliott.

Holistic management systems are exactly what global marine conservation needs most, argue Marjo Vierros and co-authors in a recent paper in the journal Marine Policy, especially as it relates to the global ocean commons, or areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ). The global ocean commons are those areas of the high seas “owned by everyone but not cared for by any single entity,” as Vierros and colleagues describe them. Individual nations may enact policies for the conservation and management of their bit of coast and the surrounding waters, known as their exclusive economic zones, but beyond that lies international waters, the high seas.

But animals don’t care about political boundaries – their migratory routes don’t change because one country stops and another begins. The lives of these animals are highly fluid, and marine animals undertake some of the longest migrations of any animal on earth. This creates a huge challenge for animal conservation, especially in marine ecosystems which are vast and already hard to regulate.

In their paper, Vierros and the rest of the team give examples of four marine animals which range widely through coastal areas as well as the global ocean commons: sea turtles, albatross, fur seals, and salmon. All travel widely, are threatened by different aspects of human activity, and have close ties to island and coastal indigenous communities.

This figure from Vierros et al. 2020 shows the relationship between exclusive economic zones, coastal indigenous communities, and the highly migratory species which are of great value to these communities. Migratory tracks are shown as colored lines, and these tracks move through the exclusive economic zones of multiple countries, as well as through the high seas.

Because many indigenous communities are located in the same place as important nesting, spawning, or breeding sites for these four species and many others, it means they are highly interconnected, and local people rely on these species as resources and for their cultural importance. Yet, it also means that many indigenous and local communities disproportionately bear both the burden of conservation work and the negative consequences of population decline. In fact, these communities are suffering the loss of these valuable species even when the human activity threatening those animals is taking place within the global ocean commons, far from the coast where indigenous resource use and management occurs.

A lesson in governance and resource management

In order to protect marine species for people across the globe who rely on them, and to safeguard ecosystems which regulate the earth’s climate and the air we breathe, we need to do a better job of governing the ungovernable, the areas beyond national jurisdiction. To do this effectively, global governing bodies like the UN must work to include indigenous peoples and local communities in management conversations. The traditional knowledge held by indigenous peoples and their stewardship practices can and should inform sustainable and equitable policies surrounding the global ocean commons.

I am a PhD candidate at Syracuse University studying marine mammal communication. My research focuses on analyzing underwater recordings of whale calls in order to better understand whale behavior. I’m also interested in education, outreach, and science communication. When I’m not listening to whale sounds, you can find me curled up with a good book or complaining about how much it snows in Syracuse.

Discussion

2 Responses to “Holistic management: the vital role of Indigenous Peoples in conservation on the high seas”

  1. Great report, it’s always fascinating to hear about interdisciplinary efforts connecting ecology and human cultures.

    Posted by Bio by the Bay | October 12, 2020, 2:32 pm
  2. Absolutely yes, BUT, did the indigenous people really “developed highly effective holistic management systems based on stewardship and intergenerational responsibility”, or did they (1) exist in such relatively small numbers related to the resource biomass and recovery capabilities, and (2) lack the capability of the technological and mass-consumptive arrogance related impacts that prevails today, that they did not have long term impacts on the resources regardless of how they utilized the resources? Something for more in-depth thought and more rigorous analysis?

    Posted by Ray Buckley | October 12, 2020, 1:21 pm

Talk to us!

WP Facebook Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
%d bloggers like this: