//
you're reading...

Conservation

Saving seabirds: how mammal management has turned into seabird success

Article: Brooke et al. 2017. Seabird population changes following mammal eradications on islands. Animal Conservation. doi:10.1111/acv.12344

Invaders still invading

The problem of invasive species is centuries old, and sometimes seems to be overshadowed by flashier or more recently discovered environmental problems like plastic pollution or climate change. Yet invasive species remain one of the paramount problems facing ecosystems around the globe. An invasive species is any species that is introduced into a new habitat without proper checks and balances; invasive species often flourish at the expense of native flora and fauna. Island habitats are particularly vulnerable to damage from invasive species, as islands are often home to unique creatures that can’t be found anywhere else, known as endemic species. These endemic species interact in very specific ways, forming fragile yet balanced island food webs. Adding an invasive species to such a balance usually results in mayhem, as the invasive species readily disrupts ecosystem balance by eating or outcompeting native creatures (i.e. cats have forced the extinction of several small land animals in Australia, or pythons are devastating populations of native species in the Everglades).

Seabird populations have plummeted by almost 70% since 1950, in a large part because of invasive predators, as these birds evolved to nest and raise their young on islands without intense predation pressure.

A Polynesian rat boldly approaches a Laysan albatross nest. Image credit: Photograph by Mark Rauzon, courtesy Holly Jones of Yale University

So all of a sudden when cats or rats or some other new predator arrives, the nesting seabirds are quite literally sitting ducks, with little to no ability to protect themselves or their own young from unfamiliar predators. Yet researchers from across the globe recently offered some hopeful insights regarding the seabird-invasive species situation; seabird populations are making a comeback on islands where invasive mammals have been removed.

Data-mining with seabird surveys

Dr. Michael Brooke from the University of Cambridge and his team rounded up existing data sets describing more than 161 seabird colonies containing 69 different seabird species around the globe; datasets had to contain metrics about how the given population was growing both before and after invasive mammals were removed. Datasets were grouped into categories based on which type of predator was removed, and were analyzed with relatively straightforward linear models to pinpoint differences  in population growth between predator removal types and between seabird species.

This simple yet effective use of existing data exposed a success story for seabirds; 151 colonies possessed positive population growth rates following predator removal, as opposed to only 23 colonies with a negative population growth rate. The median population growth rate was 1.119, meaning overall the colonies examined were expanding by adding more chicks rather than losing individuals to predation.

An overwhelming majority of the examined colonies displayed positive population growth rates (>1) following invasive mammal removal. Image credit: Brooke et al. 2017, Zoological Society of London.

Gulls and terns colonies grew in number faster compared to other seabird families, likely because gulls and terns are somewhat less site-specific when it comes to breeding location preferences, meaning some immigration between colonies buoyed initial population growth rates observed in these two families. Colonies overall did better with more comprehensive predator removal, i.e. removing all invasive predators rather than just one of several.

Population growth in seabird colonies was highest when a mixed bag of invasive mammals were removed, rather than just one type. Image credit: Brooke et al. 2017, Zoological Society of London.

A seabird success story is an ocean success story

This assessment essentially highlights something going right in conservation science; instead of harming seabirds, humans are actually helping rectify some wrongs by removing harmful invasive species from seabird breeding islands. Invasive mammal  removal policies, when implemented effectively, are a strong tool for seabird conservation, and the authors recommend that more invasive species programs incorporate post-removal monitoring to better quantify their successes. Seabirds are vital for healthy oceans and marine food webs, and act as ecological indicators in marine environments; by keeping seabirds healthy, by extension we are ensuring our own ability to enjoy and use a healthy ocean.

I am a second year doctoral student in the Lohmann Lab at the University of Rhode Island Graduate School of Oceanography. My research aims to shed some light on the distribution of contaminants in air, water, and aquatic food webs; I’m particularly interested in those compounds just starting to garner research attention, like personal care product active ingredients and novel natural products. I’m also a “bird nerd” and try to focus my research around systems supporting pelagic and coastal birds as much as possible. Before joining URI-GSO, I earned an undergrad and Masters degree at the University of North Carolina Wilmington. My research there covered a wide range of coastal water quality topics, including stormwater runoff, tidal creek production and respiration, shorebird nesting habits, and landscape influence on the health of adjacent waterways. When I’m not worried about water quality, I like to volunteer at a local wildlife rehabilitation center, pal around with my dog Gypsy or run races in a shark costume to promote shark conservation.

Discussion

No comments yet.

Talk to us!

oceanbites photostream

Subscribe to oceanbites

@oceanbites on Twitter